Tony Abdo

The US/ NATO War Against Russia.
 
 

The US/ NATO War Against Russia has started to heat up again this week.
What, you hadn't heard that there was a war against Russia?  Yes, it's one
of the biggest secrets around, but it has been going on for some time now.
Like about some 83 years or more, even befor NATO was formed.

I know, you thought that victory had been announced some time ago against
the "Godless communism" of The Soviet Union.  Most of The Right and The
Left in the Western Word had signed on in some form or another to fight
this battle.  But we missed something.

There was another battle being waged by the United States also, and
victory was never announced in this war.  That was the war of The American
Empire against The Russian Empire.  It fooled a lot of us.

It seems that many of us took the hook of Anti-communism- lock, stock, and
barrel.  Patrick Buchanan is one example, he naively thought he was in a
battle to defeat JUST "Communism" alone.  Now, he has figured it out
(ahead of the liberals), and he's pissed off.  He never wanted to fight
the Russian people themselves, he was only rabidly anti-Communist, not
anti-Russian.

Let's look at the different stages of The US War Against Russia, starting
with Stage One of the end game, Afghanistan.  Nobody, except special
forces in the US military and government, much realized what was going on.
But an opening in the decades old War Against Russia was seized upon.
And funding into the multi-billions began to flow, by way of Saudi Arabia
and Pakistan, into supporting the Afghan forces opposing Soviet interests
in the region.

Now, it is widely recognized that this was the beginning of the end for
The Soviet Union.  But as Buchanan has stated cogently, Clinton when he
came to power along with Blair and Schroeder of Germany, was not satisfied
with this "victory" alone.  The Russian Empire still remained essentially
intact, with Russia's continued control regionally, of immense natural
resources.  This could not stand.

The top government and business leaders of the US, originally appeared
sincere in wanting to help the Russian people establish what was
considered the capitalist good life.  But as time went by, it became clear
that this began to change.  First it began to change from sincere good
will, to a new desire of Western Capitalists to get rich at the expense of
the Russian people, by arriving first with the New Wave of capitalist
endeavor.

But then it also quickly became clear, that the riches were going to
accrue into the bank accounts principally of a new class of criminal
Mafiosos that were coming out of the Russian nomenclature.  THOSE, who had
guided the Communist Party into it's surrender to The West, were the
principal ricipients of the looting of the accumulated wealth of the
Soviet Union.

It became clear that no permanent stability could be built on this social
base.  So a section of the top layers of the Western Bloc countries, led
by the United States, began to plot how to come out on top of the rubble
that is soon to follow.

As excitement began to grow at the thought of the possiblity of further
looting of The Russian Empire (but this time with the benefits to directly
flow to the multinationals, not to the Russian nomenclature), a more
ambitious strategy began to be prepared to continue the war against
Russia.

Each success for The West seems to have fueled the greed.  Italy first got
Slovenia.  Germany thengot Croatia to add to it's other prizes. And the US
just recently got Bosnia and Kosovo, to add to the larget treasure chest
of them all, that of the US.  But the greed knows no end.

These treasures won at war, were not from the main body of The Russian
Empire proper.  There is still a Russian orbit, of sorts, that has stayed
out of control of The West.  And that's where the natural wealth is, both
in minerals and oil.  The focal point for control of Siberia and The
Caspian Basin oil, is The Caucasus.

Now all attention is focused almost exclusively on Russian troops
advancing on Chechenian positions.  But little attention has been focused
on Dagestan, an area attacked earlier last year by the Chechenian forces
now under retreat.  This week, the foreign minister of the US supported
breakaway "Chechenian Republic", was busy in Washington D.C. meeting with
members of The US State department.

At the same time, the Turkish "President"  was in Tbilisi, Georgia,
calling jointly with Georgian dictator Eduard Shevardnadze, for a US
supported, anti-Russian security pact for The Caucasian region.  Of
specific interest, was their reaching out to bring Azerbaijan more
securely into the US anchored alliance against the Russians.  The Russian
response?  We will use The Bomb if necessary.

We are now firmly implanted in Round Three of the end game of The War
Against Russia.  Round Two was the NATO attack on Yugoslavia.  So let's
examine the current international allignment of political forces in The
Western Bloc?

It is clear that the main bodies of The Right and The Left, have switched
allignment significantly.  The Right, represented by libertarianism and
Buchanan, has now become anti-imperialist. There is a real fear that the
greed of the multinationals will lead to nuclear war and chaos.

The main body of The Left, continues to stick with the traditional
postitions of Social Democracy and liberalism, out of a real fear of The
Traditional Right.  The Thatcher and Reagan led Right, led decades of
assault on the living standards of the Working Populations within the
Western Bloc.  And American liiberals feel that supporting imperialism, is
a price they are willing to pay, as long as the price stays at the current
low level to mainstream Americans.

Of key interest, has been the role of Trotskyists and Left Libertarians in
the Western countries; they have allied themselves with liberalism. Most
citizens are not even aware of a continued existence of such groups. But
they exist, and intellectuals and grouplets alligned with these currents,
have played a key role in formulating the new pro-imperialist consensus.

Since the days of when the struggle for control of Bosnia began, these Far
Left intellectual currents have been the most adept at enumerating in the
popular press, the supposed "humanitarianism" of the new imperialist
intevention.  They have been the leaders in proposing what they consider
to be "principled intervention".

This then translates, into popular support for intervention by the
imperial powers, into the areas where they want to go.......be it
Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia, Kosovo, East Timor, The Caucasus, and even into
maintaining a continuing war against the Iraqi people.  Did I forget to
mention Somalia, Haiti, Sudan, and now into Colombia to fight the so
called "drug guerillas"?

This intellectual current, of Left Libertariansim and Trotskyist groupings
combining with liberalism, does not believe that there is a US war going
on against Russia.  They so predominate in Left circles ideologically,
that this war against Russia continues to be a secret for the majority of
the Western public.

This, despite the obvious effects that this war has had on the ex-Soviet
Bloc.  It is all attributed away to, supposed inefficiency on the part of
the new economic and political leaders of those countries.  Despite their
"higher" education, these intellectual forces only see war in terms of
bombs falling.  Never into much more.

One would think, that The Left would recognize other forms of war, such as
ideological war or economic war, but they conveniently leave mention of
this warfare out of their posturing , when it interferes with giving
ideological support to Western imperial, "humanitarian" intervention.  A
very few tears are shed later.

The old standby favorite of The Left, was the word IMPERIALISM.  But
precisely when The Right has begun to struggle against what they call THE
NEW WORLD ORDER, The Left has seemed to banish all mention of this
concept.  Though sometimes it is brought forth to label the victims of the
NWO!

It should be the duty of all, to try to oppose the continuation of The US
War Against Russia.  But actually, many Left forces are mobilizing
continually to blame Russia, just as they blamed Serbia.

Their claims to oppose US foreign policy usually are combined with
opposition to internal or regional policies of other countries.  This is
supposed to equate to a higher, more moral plane occupied in the abstract.
In the concrete, it means inaction.  No opposition at home to Clintonism.

It is time to build a new antiwar movement in the US.  Elements of both
The Left and The Right will have to be present.  We The People can unite
in our opposition to a conflict that can only lead to barbaric
destruction.  The Russian people will try to defend themselves, no matter
who their leaders are.

The Clinton wars of aggression are leading us closer and closer to the
danger of nuclear resolutions, from Kashmir to The Caucasus.  Another
Chernobyl, is even more a likely possiblity, as resources get scantier and
scantier, in the defeated countries of Eastern Europe.

Past leaders, that absent themselves from a call to alliance in the
streets, are not being responsible in showing opposition to The US War
Machine.  What is holding people like Noam Chomsky or Ralph Nader back?
Call for Building A New Alliance For Antiwar Action.  Do it today.

US Hands Off The Caucasus!
No War For Oil!
Stop The US/ NATO War Against Russia!

Sincerely, Tony Abdo
 
TopListRambler's Top100 Service